I decided to leave my family temple, which had been our ancestral temple for generations, and also close the family grave. The reason was that I had endless personal concerns and worries. I tried various things I found on the internet and through word of mouth, and they seemed to work at the time, but then the worries would gradually resurface. They were small concerns, but just to be sure, I am mentally healthy and have recently taken out a new insurance policy. However, I came to the conclusion that I needed to reduce the number of phenomena that I could not confirm the cause or effect of, and that this was a method of ‘dieting.’ Moreover, it could be called a process of elimination, but first, I don’t feel any benefits from visiting the grave, and the round-trip transportation costs, flowers, incense, lighters, offerings, and other items are cumbersome. In summer, it’s hot, and in winter, it’s cold. The cost-effectiveness is low, so I decided to delete it. When I reviewed the husband’s temple membership contract as an accessory, the only thing left was the summer back-scratching memorial service? This ceremony was the only thing left, but after verification, I personally felt it had no efficacy. The only thing left was paying the annual fee, and I felt there was no benefit in continuing to be a member of this religious organisation, especially since it felt like an unspoken inheritance from my parents. There was also an implicit suggestion that reciting the doctrinal teachings was mandatory, but the act of forcing oneself to utter words that did not come from the heart felt unsettling, meaning Considering the possibility that it might constitute a breach of contract, what do you think about this as fiction?