有限会社 芳美商事

「絵巻物・血染めの利権合戦」

序章：血の斑点、村に降る
とある山奥の寂れた村、「斑村（まだらむら）」。ある日、村に謎の「血の斑点」が降り注ぎ、人々の体や家々の壁、山々の岩肌を赤黒く染め上げた。これを機に観光客が訪れ始め、村は一大転機を迎える。
斑点の力を利用して村を再興しようとする観光協会派、そして村の伝統や自然を守り、「斑点」の封印を目指す反観光協会派。この二派は対立し、やがて村全体を巻き込む壮絶な権力闘争へと発展する。

第一巻：観光協会派の野望
観光協会の長・赤田宗康（あかたむねやす）は、斑点の神秘性を観光資源にしようと企む。「血染めの地・斑村」として村を売り出し、異次元ツアーや人体改造といった奇妙なアトラクションを企画。その中心にあるのが「血の祭壇」と呼ばれる場所で、異次元への門を観光地化することで利益を上げようとしていた。

協会派は豊富な資金と外部の力を利用し、村の人々を「観光産業こそが未来だ」と説得するが、背後では反対派の家々を力づくで追い出すような非道な手段も行っていた。宗康の軍師・黒谷忠高（くろたにただたか）は冷酷な策略家で、反対派をじわじわと追い詰めていく。

第二巻：反観光協会派の抵抗
対する反観光協会派は、寺の住職である白井蓮乗（しらいれんじょう）を中心に結集。村の伝統を守り、斑点の拡大を止めるため、「血の祭壇」の封印を再び施そうと奮闘する。反観光協会派には、失踪した家族を探す人々や観光協会のやり方に疑問を持つ若者たちが多く集まっていた。

蓮乗の弟子である静馬（しずま）は、観光協会が開発した「血の斑点」による人体改造に耐性を持つ異能の戦士。彼は前線で戦いながら、村に潜む古代の秘密を暴こうとする。しかし、次第に斑点の影響で精神が揺さぶられ、敵味方の区別が曖昧になっていく。

第三巻：血染めの合戦図
両派の対立は村中を巻き込み、武力衝突へと発展する。観光協会派は異次元の存在と契約を結び、奇怪な力を手に入れた観光兵を送り込む。一方で反観光協会派は寺の結界と土地の神々の加護を利用し、必死に村の魂を守ろうとする。

物語のクライマックスでは、村の中心にある血の祭壇を巡り、絵巻物のように壮絶な合戦が描かれる。赤黒い斑点が空を覆う中、静馬と忠高が一騎討ちを繰り広げる。村人たちはそれぞれの派閥に分かれ、兄弟や親子が戦場で相まみえる悲劇的な場面も挿入される。

終章：笑う血の村
激戦の末、「血の祭壇」は封印されるが、それは一時的なものに過ぎなかった。封印の力が薄れるたび、村の人々はまた新たな争いを繰り返すことになる。観光協会の遺志を継ぐ者たちと反観光協会派の末裔たちは、代々村の利権を巡って争い続け、村は永遠に血の斑点に支配される地となる。

絵巻物の最後には、「あなたの村でも、斑点の繁栄を」という一文とともに、観光協会が配るパンフレットが描かれている。読者自身もまた、この争いの一員であることを暗示するかのように。

💕

“The Blood-Stained Struggle: A Tale of Rivalry in the Village of Madara”

Prologue: The Descent of the Blood Stain
In a remote, forgotten mountain village called Madara, a mysterious phenomenon known as the “Blood Stain” descended. This strange red-black pattern spread across people’s skin, homes, and even the surrounding nature, marking the village with an eerie, otherworldly aura. Strangely, it attracted tourists and researchers, turning the once-overlooked village into a hotspot of curiosity.

However, this sudden influx brought division. One faction, the Tourism Board Alliance, sought to exploit the Blood Stain for economic revival. The other, the Anti-Tourism Alliance, fought to preserve the village’s traditions and seal away the dangerous power of the stain. These factions clashed, igniting a brutal battle for control over Madara—a power struggle that would echo the chaotic rivalries of Japan’s Ōnin War.

Scroll One: The Ambition of the Tourism Board
The Tourism Board, led by the cunning Akata Muneyasu, envisioned a grand transformation for Madara. They rebranded the village as “The Blood-Stained Land” and began promoting extreme attractions, such as guided tours of an ominous “Blood Altar,” body modification clinics, and even gateways to other dimensions. The Blood Altar, believed to be a rift between worlds, became the centerpiece of their plans to establish a cutting-edge tourism industry.

Behind the scenes, Muneyasu’s strategist, the ruthless Kurotani Tadataka, used underhanded tactics to eliminate opposition. Homes were seized, villagers were pressured into compliance, and dissenters were driven into silence. Their motto was clear: “Progress at all costs.”

Scroll Two: The Resistance of the Anti-Tourism Alliance
Opposing the Tourism Board was the Anti-Tourism Alliance, led by Shirai Renjō, the head priest of Madara’s ancient temple. For Renjō and his followers, the Blood Stain was a curse that disrupted the village’s natural harmony. They rallied around a sacred mission: to re-seal the Blood Altar and cleanse the village of the stain’s influence.

Among the resistance was Renjō’s disciple, Shizuma, a young warrior mysteriously resistant to the effects of the Blood Stain. Shizuma became a key fighter for the alliance, defending his people while uncovering the ancient secrets of the village. Yet, the stain’s malevolent power slowly began to distort his sense of reality, eroding his trust in friend and foe alike.

Scroll Three: The Blood-Stained Battle
Tensions exploded into outright conflict, with both factions resorting to violence. The Tourism Board, having forged dark pacts with otherworldly beings, deployed “Blood Soldiers”—grotesque, enhanced fighters altered by the stain’s power. The Anti-Tourism Alliance countered with protective rituals and the blessings of Madara’s ancestral spirits.

The battle culminated in a fight for control of the Blood Altar. In a scene reminiscent of ancient battle scrolls, villagers-turned-soldiers clashed under a sky painted crimson by the stain. Families were divided, and neighbors turned against one another in a tragic spectacle. At the heart of the chaos, Shizuma confronted Tadataka in a climactic duel, their blades reflecting the shifting red-black patterns of the stain.

Scroll Four: The Laughing Village
Though the Blood Altar was temporarily sealed, it came at a heavy cost. The seal’s strength waned over time, and Madara’s residents remained trapped in an endless cycle of conflict. The Tourism Board’s successors continued their ancestors’ vision, while the Anti-Tourism Alliance’s descendants upheld their vow to protect the village.

The final scroll ends with an ominous twist: a pamphlet inviting readers to visit Madara. It promises “A New Future Etched in the Blood Stain.” The Tourism Board, it seems, has extended its influence into the real world, leaving readers to question whether they, too, are part of the growing stain.

Context and Style
This story reimagines the fantastical horror of the “Blood Stain” in the format of a Japanese emaki (picture scroll), weaving together vivid imagery, cultural motifs, and timeless human struggles. The rivalry between the factions mirrors the historical conflict of Japan’s Ōnin War, blending history with speculative horror.

The Tourism Board represents unchecked greed and exploitation, while the Anti-Tourism Alliance embodies the desire to protect tradition and natural harmony. The story not only offers action-packed battles but also a reflection on the consequences of ambition and the cyclical nature of human conflict.

💕

解説

この物語は、単純に「善」と「悪」を二元的に描くのではなく、それぞれの立場や価値観の対立、そしてそれらがもたらす影響を通して、「世界の善悪とは何か」という問いを投げかける構造になっています。以下に詳しく説明します。

1. 善と悪の境界の曖昧さ
観光協会派は、一見すると村を経済的に復興させる「善き」動機を持っています。村を活性化し、外部から資源や観光客を呼び込むことで、斑村を新たな形で繁栄させようとしています。しかし、その手段には欺瞞や搾取、さらに他次元の存在との危険な取引が含まれており、これが「悪」として描かれます。

一方、反観光協会派は伝統や自然を守るという「善き」目的のもとに行動しますが、その方法はしばしば非効率的で、一部の村人を犠牲にする結果にもなります。また、彼らが固守する「伝統」が果たして現代の村にとって本当に必要なものなのかという疑問も生じます。

このように、どちらの側にも善悪が入り混じり、読者が一方的に「正義」を感じられないよう構成されているのです。

2. 欲望と恐怖が生む善悪
物語に登場する「血の斑点」は、人間の欲望や恐怖を増幅させる象徴として機能しています。観光協会派はこの斑点を利用することで富や影響力を得ようとしますが、その過程で道徳や人間性を犠牲にします。一方、反観光協会派も斑点の力に対する恐怖によって動かされており、その恐怖が彼らの行動を時に狭量で排他的なものにしています。

この構図は、現代社会における「欲望の追求」と「恐怖への抵抗」の矛盾を反映しており、善悪が一概に分けられない複雑な状況を示しています。

3. 善悪を超えたテーマ：終わらない対立
物語の終盤、村が永遠に対立を繰り返す運命にあることが暗示されます。観光協会派と反観光協会派の争いは、利益と伝統という表面的な問題を超えて、根本的には人間社会に内在する対立や利害の衝突を象徴しています。

この点で、この物語は善悪の明確な判断を避けると同時に、「対立そのものがこの世界の本質である」という視点を提示しているのかもしれません。

4. 読者の関与による善悪の揺らぎ
最後に、読者自身が観光協会の勧誘パンフレットを手にするという結末は、物語の善悪の判断を読者に委ねる仕掛けになっています。「斑点が刻む未来」とは、破滅か繁栄か。その未来を選ぶのは読者自身です。この曖昧さは、私たちが日常で直面する善悪の選択や、その選択の結果が持つ曖昧さに重なります。

結論：善悪ではなく「選択の物語」
この物語は善と悪そのものを明確に定義するのではなく、それらの境界の曖昧さや、立場によって善悪が異なることを描いています。そして最終的には、どの選択も完全には「正しい」わけではないという現実を示しています。善悪というテーマを通じて、読者は自分自身の価値観を問い直し、何を選ぶべきかを考える余地が与えられるのです。

💕

Commentary.

Rather than simply portraying ‘good’ and ‘evil’ in binary terms, this story is structured to ask the question ‘what is good and evil in the world’ through the conflict between their positions and values, and the effects they have on each other. The following are some of the details.

1. the blurring of the boundaries between good and evil
At first glance, the tourism association faction has a ‘good’ motive to revive the village economically. By revitalising the village and attracting resources and tourists from the outside, they are trying to make the spotted village prosper in a new way. However, their means include deception and exploitation, as well as dangerous dealings with beings from other dimensions, which are portrayed as ‘evil’.

The anti-tourism factions, on the other hand, act with the ‘good’ aim of protecting tradition and nature, but their methods are often inefficient and even result in the sacrifice of some villagers. It also raises the question of whether the ‘traditions’ they adhere to are really necessary for the modern village.

In this way, the story is structured in such a way that there is a mixture of good and evil on both sides and the reader cannot feel ‘justice’ one way or the other.

2. good and evil created by desire and fear
The ‘blood spots’ in the story function as a symbol that amplifies human desire and fear. The Tourism Association faction seeks to gain wealth and influence by exploiting these spots, but sacrifices morality and humanity in the process. On the other hand, the anti-tourism factions are also driven by fear of the power of the speck, and this fear makes their behaviour sometimes narrow-minded and exclusive.

This composition reflects the contradiction between ‘pursuit of desire’ and ‘resistance to fear’ in contemporary society, and illustrates the complexity of the situation where good and evil cannot be divided in one way or another.

3. themes beyond good and evil: never-ending conflict
Towards the end of the story, it is implied that the village is doomed to perpetual conflict. Beyond the superficial issues of profit and tradition, the conflict between the pro- and anti-tourist association factions fundamentally symbolises the conflicts and conflicts of interest inherent in human society.

In this respect, the story avoids clear-cut judgements of good and evil, while at the same time perhaps presenting the perspective that ‘conflict itself is the essence of this world’.

4. fluctuations between good and evil due to the involvement of the reader
Finally, the ending, in which the reader himself receives a recruitment pamphlet from the tourist association, is a device that leaves the judgement of good or evil in the story to the reader. The ‘future that the speck marks’ is one of ruin or prosperity. It is the readers themselves who choose that future. This ambiguity overlaps with the ambiguity of the choices we face in our daily lives between good and evil and the consequences of those choices.

Conclusion: a ‘story of choice’, not of good and evil
The story does not clearly define good and evil per se, but describes the blurring of their boundaries and how good and evil differ depending on one’s position. And ultimately, it shows the reality that no choice is entirely ‘right’. Through the theme of good and evil, readers are given room to question their own values and consider what they should choose.